Buddhist communities in India have long advocated for greater control over the Mahabodhi Mahavihara (Mahabodhi Temple) in Bodh Gaya, Bihar, aiming to manage the site in alignment with their religious traditions. The Bodhgaya Temple Act of 1949 established the Bodhgaya Temple Management Committee (BTMC), which includes both Hindu and Buddhist members, with the district magistrate (DM) of Gaya serving as the chairman. Historically, the DM has been Hindu, reinforcing Hindu influence over the temple's administration.
Buddhist leaders argue that this governance structure marginalizes their community, as Buddhists constitute only four of the nine committee members. They contend that the BTMC's decisions often reflect Hindu practices, such as the introduction of Shiva Lingam symbols and Hindu rituals within the temple complex, which they believe compromises the site's Buddhist identity.
In response, Buddhist monks and followers have initiated protests, including hunger strikes, to demand the repeal of the 1949 Act and the establishment of a management committee with a Buddhist majority. These actions have garnered support from various Buddhist organizations worldwide, emphasizing the need for Buddhist autonomy in managing their holiest site.
he Republican Party has also voiced support for these demands, calling for the repeal of the 1949 Act to ensure that the Mahabodhi Temple is managed by Buddhists in accordance with their traditions.
These developments highlight ongoing tensions over religious representation and control of sacred sites in India, reflecting broader discussions about secularism and religious autonomy within the country's governance framework.

No comments:
Post a Comment